Selected work
Four projects. Each one built to solve a real problem, not to demonstrate capability in the abstract. The thinking behind each one is available on request.
Kirkpatrick's four-level model has shaped L&D evaluation for fifty years. It has a structural flaw: the four levels aren't a hierarchy, they are different dimensions requiring entirely different measurement approaches. Under Goodhart's Law, organisations inevitably optimise for what is easy to measure and stop asking whether any of it is working.
What was built
A three-axis evaluation framework: skill progression, experience quality, and business connection. Each assessed independently rather than sequentially. The framework was published as a six-part article series, then implemented as working analytics software with four dashboard views: Learner, Manager, L&D, and Leadership.
Why it matters for clients
Organisations investing in AI enablement need to know whether it is working.
TriAxis makes the problem visible. The Leadership view includes an "Attribution Honesty" panel that explicitly distinguishes between direct impact, correlation, and unknown — because honest measurement is more useful than flattering measurement.
NHS waiting lists are not queues. They are systems subject to random disruption: surgery trays not returned from sterile services, operating rooms double-booked, admin errors, GP referrals delayed. Patients believe they are progressing steadily toward treatment. The reality is a game of Snakes and Ladders.
What was built
A real-time simulation showing four patients moving through an NHS waiting list simultaneously, subject to the same disruptions that occur in the actual system. Each patient's journey diverges in ways that are impossible to predict but structurally inevitable. The simulation makes a complex, invisible system visible in under two minutes.
Why it matters for clients
The same simulation logic applies to any process with unpredictable bottlenecks:
If your organisation has a process that people assume is a queue, this approach will show them what it actually is.
The personal context: I became septic before I was treated.
AI systems have no memory between sessions. Every conversation starts from zero. For a practitioner using AI as a genuine working tool, this means rebuilding context constantly and losing accumulated knowledge. The constraint that most people accept as a given turned out to be an architecture problem with an architecture solution.
What was built
A five-layer memory architecture that gives an AI system genuine continuity across sessions. The original implementation used a flat JSON file that consumed 113,000 tokens at startup. The current architecture loads in under 1,500 tokens, a 75x reduction, while indexing over 300 entries of accumulated knowledge, decisions, and project history.
Why it matters for clients
It is about what the architecture demonstrates:
The 8-minute video below explains the system to a non-technical audience, because translation is as important as construction.
Most AI-assisted CV tools work from a blank slate. They ask you to describe yourself and produce something generic. The problem is that most people are poor historians of their own careers — they understate, misremember, or default to the same tired phrases. The starting point shouldn't be a blank page. It should be the truth.
What was built
A Claude Project built on a curated inventory extracted from 50 real CVs, structured across seven dimensions: experience, skills, tools and platforms, evidence, qualifications, language and tone, and negative space (what to avoid claiming). Given any job description, CoVey analyses fit, identifies what the hiring team will value, and produces an ATS-ready CV from verified truth rather than inflated claims.
Why it matters for clients
CoVey was built for personal use first — the most honest test of whether something actually works. The principle it embodies is the same one that applies to any AI-assisted HR or L&D tool: garbage in, garbage out. Curated, honest input produces genuinely useful output. The name is a happy coincidence: CoVey shares its letters with CV, and like Stephen Covey's method, it starts with the end in mind.
The seven dimensions
Experience
What you have actually done, with context and evidence
Skills
Demonstrable capabilities, not self-assessed adjectives
Tools & Platforms
Specific systems and technologies, with depth of use
Evidence & Qualifications
Credentials and outcomes that can be verified
Temporal & Structural Consistency
Career narrative that holds together under scrutiny
Language & Tone Signals
How you communicate, not just what you say
Negative Space
What to avoid — overclaiming, unsupported assertions, irrelevance